基于临床及肿瘤生物学特征的儿童髓母细胞瘤预后列线图构建及验证
收稿日期: 2021-09-26
网络出版日期: 2022-07-08
Construction and validation of the prognosis nomogram of pediatric medulloblastoma based on clinical and tumor biological characteristics
Received date: 2021-09-26
Online published: 2022-07-08
目的 确定小儿髓母细胞瘤(MB)免疫组化结果中是否存在预后预测潜力的标志物,并整合临床特征构建指导MB患儿术后个性化管理的风险分层系统。方法 回顾分析2011年1月1日至2020年8月1日因MB行切除手术患儿的临床资料,构建logistic回归模型预测术后肿瘤残余这一短期结局(STO)。根据术后STO和影像转移特征将患儿分为高风险组和低风险组,采用COX回归模型分析影响复发、再次手术和生存等长期结局(LTO)的独立危险因素,应用R软件构建列线图模型,通过C指数、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评价模型。结果 纳入MB患儿111例,男67例、女44例,中位年龄7.0(4.0~9.0)岁。肿瘤直径>5.0 cm(OR=8.07,95% CI:2.62~24.89)和MYC蛋白表达(OR=4.03,95% CI:1.29~12.63)可预测STO(AUC=0.81,95% CI:0.69~0.92,P<0.001)。高风险组(n=50)12个月无LTO生存率(LOFS)为76.0%(95% CI:70.0%~82.0%),低风险组(n=61)为83.6%(95% CI:78.9%~88.3%),两组差异有统计学意义(HR=2.77,95% CI:1.53~5.01)。COX回归分析显示,风险分组、年龄≤3岁、肿瘤直径>5.0 cm、MYC阳性是患儿LTO不佳的独立危险因素(P<0.05),基于以上临床-生物独立危险因素建立列线图可准确预测患儿LOFS,其C指数为0.715,并且在校准曲线中显示列线图预测风险与实际发生风险的一致程度较高,DCA中在较大的预测概率范围内该列线图都有不错的净收益,展示出良好的临床效用。结论 使用风险分组、年龄、肿瘤直径和MYC构建的列线图有利于对小儿MB进行有针对性的监测和管理。
张再禹 , 梁平 . 基于临床及肿瘤生物学特征的儿童髓母细胞瘤预后列线图构建及验证[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2022 , 40(7) : 527 -533 . DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2022.21e1377
Objective To identify potential prognostic markers of pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) in immunohistochemical results, and to construct a risk stratification system based on the integration of clinical characteristics, so as to guide the postoperative personalized management of MB children. Methods The clinical data of children with MB undergoing resection from January 1, 2011 to August 1, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the logistic regression model was constructed to predict the short-term outcomes (STO) (postoperative tumor residue). The children were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to postoperative STO and imaging metastasis characteristics. The COX regression model was used to analyze the independent risk factors for long-term outcome (LTO) including recurrence, reoperation and survival. R software was used to construct the nomogram, and the nomogram was evaluated by C-index, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results A total of 111 children (67 boys and 44 girls) with MB were included, with a median age of 7.0 (4.0-9.0) years. Tumor diameter >5.0 cm (OR=8.07, 95% CI: 2.62-24.89) and MYC protein expression (OR=4.03, 95% CI: 1.29-12.63) can predict STO (AUC=0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92, P<0.001). The 12-month LTO-free survival (LOFS) of the high-risk group (n=50) was 76.0% (95% CI: 70.0%-82.0%), and that of the low-risk group (n=61) was 83.6% (95% CI: 78.9% -88.3%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (HR=2.77, 95% CI: 1.53-5.01). COX regression model showed that risk grouping, age≤3 years, diameter>5.0 cm, and MYC positive were independent risk factors for poor LTO (P<0.05). Based on the above clinical-biological independent risk factors, LOFS can be accurately predicted by establishing a nomogram, with a C-index of 0.715. Moreover, the calibration curve showed a high degree of consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk. The net benefit was good in DCA for a wide range of prediction probabilities, demonstrating a good clinical utility. Conclusions The nomogram constructed based on risk grouping, age, tumor diameter and MYC are conducive to the targeted monitoring and management of pediatric MB.
Key words: medulloblastoma; prognosis; nomogram
[1] | Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014-2018[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23(12 Suppl 2): iii1-iii105. |
[2] | Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C Jr. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas[J]. Radiology, 1969, 93(6): 1351-1359. |
[3] | Thomas A, Noël G. Medulloblastoma: optimizing care with a multidisciplinary approach[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2019, 12: 335-347. |
[4] | Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23(8): 1231-1251. |
[5] | Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2007, 114(2): 97-109. |
[6] | Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2016, 131(6): 803-820. |
[7] | Carvalho RM, Pinto GR, Yoshioka FK, et al. Prognostic value of the TP53 Arg72Pro single-nucleotide poly-morphism and susceptibility to medulloblastoma in a cohort of Brazilian patients[J]. J Neurooncol, 2012, 110(1): 49-57. |
[8] | de Haas T, Hasselt N, Troost D, et al. Molecular risk stratification of medulloblastoma patients based on immunohistochemical analysis of MYC, LDHB, and CCNB1 expression[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14(13): 4154-4160. |
[9] | Gajjar A, Robinson GW, Smith KS, et al. Outcomes by clinical and molecular features in children with medulloblastoma treated with risk-adapted therapy: results of an international phase III trial (SJMB03)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(7): 822-835. |
[10] | Thompson EM, Hielscher T, Bouffet E, et al. Prognostic value of medulloblastoma extent of resection after accounting for molecular subgroup: a retrospective integrated clinical and molecular analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(4): 484-495. |
[11] | Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10(21): 7252-7259. |
[12] | Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification[M/OL]. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. http://doi.org/10.1007/12-1694-0_16. |
[13] | Van Calster B, Wynants L, Verbeek JFM, et al. Reporting and interpreting decision curve analysis: a guide for investigators[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 74(6): 796-804. |
[14] | Huybrechts S, Le Teuff G, Tauziède-Espariat A, et al. Prognostic clinical and biologic features for overall survival after relapse in childhood medulloblastoma[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 13(1): 53. |
[15] | Hill RM, Richardson S, Schwalbe EC, et al. Time, pattern, and outcome of medulloblastoma relapse and their association with tumour biology at diagnosis and therapy: a multicentre cohort study[J]. Lancet Child Adolescent Health, 2020, 4(12): 865-874. |
[16] | Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, et al. Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children's Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(3): 832-845. |
[17] | Kortmann RD, Kühl J, Timmermann B, et al. Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT '91[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 46(2): 269-279. |
[18] | Taylor RE, Bailey CC, Robinson KJ, et al. Outcome for patients with metastatic (M2-3) medulloblastoma treated with SIOP/UKCCSG PNET-3 chemotherapy[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005, 41(5): 727-734. |
[19] | Lee JW, Lim DH, Sung KW, et al. Promising survival rate but high incidence of treatment-related mortality after reduced-dose craniospinal radiotherapy and tandem high-dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk medulloblastoma[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(16): 5807-5818. |
[20] | Dietzsch S, Placzek F, Pietschmann K, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors and role of participation in a randomized trial or a prospective registry in pediatric and adolescent nonmetastatic medulloblastoma - a report from the HIT 2000 trial[J]. Adv Radiat Oncol, 2020, 5(6): 1158-1169. |
[21] | Dhall G, O'Neil SH, Ji L, et al. Excellent outcome of young children with nodular desmoplastic medulloblastoma treated on "Head Start" III: a multi-institutional, prospective clinical trial[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2020, 22(12): 1862-1872. |
[22] | AL-Afif S, Krauss JK, Helms F, et al. Long-term impairment of social behavior, vocalizations and motor activity induced by bilateral lesions of the fastigial nucleus in juvenile rats[J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2019, 224(5): 1739-1751. |
[23] | Hoche F, Guell X, Vangel MG, et al. The cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome scale[J]. Brain, 2018, 141(1): 248-270. |
[24] | Lanier JC, Abrams AN. Posterior fossa syndrome: review of the behavioral and emotional aspects in pediatric cancer patients[J]. Cancer, 2017, 123(4): 551-559. |
[25] | von Hoff K, Hartmann W, von Bueren AO, et al. Large cell/anaplastic medulloblastoma: outcome according to myc status, histopathological, and clinical risk factors[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2010, 54(3): 369-376. |
[26] | Ryan SL, Schwalbe EC, Cole M, et al. MYC family amplification and clinical risk-factors interact to predict an extremely poor prognosis in childhood medulloblastoma[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2012, 123(4): 501-513. |
[27] | Srivastava VK, Nalbantoglu J. The cellular and developmental biology of medulloblastoma: current perspectives on experimental therapeutics[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2010, 9(11): 843-852. |
[28] | Ray A, Ho M, Ma J, et al. A clinicobiological model predicting survival in medulloblastoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10(22): 7613-7620. |
[29] | Korshunov A, Savostikova M, Ozerov S. Immuno-histochemical markers for prognosis of average-risk pediatric medulloblastomas. The effect of apoptotic index, TrkC, and c-myc expression[J]. J Neurooncol, 2002, 58(3): 271-279. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |