综合报道

无创肝纤维化评估在儿童肝豆状核变性进展期肝纤维化诊断价值

  • 姜涛 ,
  • 欧阳文献 ,
  • 谭艳芳 ,
  • 唐莲 ,
  • 张慧 ,
  • 李双杰
展开
  • 湖南省儿童医院肝病中心(湖南长沙 410007)

收稿日期: 2021-10-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-07-08

Value of noninvasive liver fibrosis evaluation in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis in children with Wilson’s disease

  • Tao JIANG ,
  • Wenxian OUYANG ,
  • Yanfang TAN ,
  • Lian TANG ,
  • Hui ZHANG ,
  • Shuangjie LI
Expand
  • Department of Hepatopathy Center, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China

Received date: 2021-10-08

  Online published: 2022-07-08

摘要

目的 探讨临床生化指标、瞬时弹性成像技术及无创肝纤维化评分在肝豆状核变性(WD)儿童进展期肝纤维化诊断中的价值。方法 收集2018年10月至2021年7月22例WD患儿的临床资料。患儿均行肝脏穿刺,采用瞬时弹性成像技术检测肝脏硬度值(LSM)。根据病理检查结果将患儿分为进展期肝纤维化(S3和S4期)和非进展期肝纤维化(S0、S1和S2期)两组,计算3种无创肝纤维化评分(Sheth、APRI和FIB-4指数),比较两组间临床生化指标、无创肝纤维化评分和LSM的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各指标对进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值。结果 22例WD患儿中,男12例、女10例,平均年龄(8.6±2.7)岁;非进展期肝纤维化为13例(59.1%),进展期肝纤维化9例(40.9%)。与非进展期肝纤维化组相比,进展期肝纤维化组中白蛋白、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)和血小板(PLT)水平较低,凝血酶原时间(PT)和国际标准化比值(INR)水平较高,LSM、Sheth和FIB-4指数较高,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。ROC曲线分析提示,LSM(AUC=1.0)对进展期肝纤维化的诊断效能最大,其次为AST、PLT、PT、INR、FIB-4和Sheth指数(AUC均>0.7)。结论 AST、PLT、PT、INR、LSM、Sheth和FIB-4指数在儿童WD进展期肝纤维化中有一定的诊断价值,可以作为进展期肝纤维化的无创诊断参考指标。

本文引用格式

姜涛 , 欧阳文献 , 谭艳芳 , 唐莲 , 张慧 , 李双杰 . 无创肝纤维化评估在儿童肝豆状核变性进展期肝纤维化诊断价值[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2022 , 40(7) : 534 -538 . DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2022.21e1399

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of clinical biochemical parameters, transient elastography and noninvasive liver fibrosis score in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis in children with Wilson's disease (WD). Methods The clinical data of 22 WD patients from October 2018 to July 2021 were collected. All the children underwent liver biopsy, and the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was measured by transient elastography. According to the pathological examination results, the children were divided into advanced liver fibrosis (S3 and S4) group and non-advanced liver fibrosis (S0, S1 and S2) group. Three kinds of non-invasive liver fibrosis scores (Sheth, APRI and FIB-4 index) were calculated, and the differences of clinical biochemical indexes, non-invasive liver fibrosis score and LSM between the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of each index for advanced liver fibrosis. Results Twenty-two WD children (12 boys and 10 girls) were included, with an average age of (8.6±2.7) years. There were 13 cases (59.1%) with non-advanced liver fibrosis and 9 cases (40.9%) with advanced liver fibrosis. Compared with non-advanced liver fibrosis group, the levels of albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and platelet (PLT) in advanced liver fibrosis group were lower, the prothrombin time (PT) and international standardized ratio (INR) were higher, and the indexes of LSM, Sheth and FIB-4 were higher, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis indicated that LSM (AUC=1.0) had the highest diagnostic efficacy for advanced liver fibrosis, followed by AST, PLT, PT, INR, FIB-4 and Sheth index (AUC>0.7). Conclusions AST, PLT, PT, INR, LSM, Sheth and FIB-4 index have certain diagnostic values in children with WD advanced liver fibrosis, and they can be used as a noninvasive diagnostic reference index in advanced liver fibrosis.

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经遗传病学组. 中国肝豆状核变性诊治指南[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2021, 54(4): 310-319.
[2] 方峰. 儿童肝豆状核变性的长期治疗与随访管理[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(10): 1936-1938.
[3] 姜涛, 李双杰, 欧阳文献, 等. 330例遗传代谢性肝病患儿病因学分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2021, 39(1): 6-8.
[4] 中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会消化病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 肝纤维化诊断及治疗共识(2019)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2019, 27(9): 657-667.
[5] 张启迪, 陆伦根. 无创肝纤维化/肝硬化评估技术的现状[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2018, 26(5): 325-327.
[6] Brunt EM. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: The Knodell histology activity index and beyond[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31 (1): 241-246.
[7] Kim WR, Berg T, Asselah T, et al. Evaluation of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients[J]. J Hepatol, 2016, 64(4): 773-780.
[8] 朱世殊, 董漪, 徐志强, 等. 以肝病为首发表现的儿童肝豆状核变性临床、病理及基因突变特征研究[J]. 传染病信息, 2013, 26(5): 272-275.
[9] Roberts E A, Socha P. Wilson disease in children[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2017, 142: 141-156.
[10] Schilsky ML. Liver transplantation for Wilson’s disease[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2014, 1315: 45-49.
[11] 周丽娜, 林春, 潘晨, 等. 三种无创性肝纤维化评价方法在肝功能轻微异常的慢性HBV感染者中的诊断价值[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2019, 12(4): 268-274.
[12] 仇丽霞, 梁珊, 范作鹏, 等. FibroScan对慢性丙型肝炎进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值及其影响因素[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(9): 1950-1953.
[13] 中国肝炎防治基金会, 中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会和中国研究型医院学会肝病专业委员会. 瞬时弹性成像技术诊断肝纤维化专家共识(2018年更新版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2019, 27(3): 182-191.
[14] Marella HK, Reddy YK, Jiang Y, et al. Accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems in African American and white patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2020, 11(4): e00165.
[15] Amernia B, Moosavy SH, Banookh F, et al. FIB-4, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio compared to FibroScan for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Bandar Abbas, Iran[J]. BMC gastroenterol, 2021, 21(1): 453.
[16] Mesropyan N, Kupczyk P, Dold L, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis: Diagnostic value of liver magnetic resonance parametric mapping including extracellular volume fraction[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2021, 46(6): 2458-2466.
[17] 梁晨, 刘晖, 白洁, 等. 常见临床指标及无创肝纤维化评分对中国肝病型Wilson 病进展期肝纤维化的诊断价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(3): 570-574.
[18] Paternostro R, Pfeiffenberger J, Ferenci P, et al. Non- invasive diag nosis of cirrhosis and long-term disease monitoring by transient elastography in patients with Wilson disease[J]. Liver Int, 2020, 40(4): 894-904.
[19] Sini M, Sorbello O, Civolani A, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in a series of patients with Wilson’s Disease[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2012, 44(6): 487-491.
文章导航

/