新生儿CHARGE综合征5例临床及基因变异分析
收稿日期: 2022-05-16
网络出版日期: 2023-11-08
基金资助
2022年度河南省重点研发与推广专项（科技攻关）(222102310171);2021年度河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20210636)
Analysis of clinical features and gene mutations in five neonates with CHARGE syndrome
Received date: 2022-05-16
Online published: 2023-11-08
目的 分析5例诊断为新生儿CHARGE综合征患儿的临床特征及基因变异特点，明确死亡患儿的遗传学病因。方法 收集5例患儿的临床资料，应用高通量测序技术对5例疑诊CHARGE综合征患儿进行检测，利用Sanger测序技术对可疑位点和核心家系成员进行验证。结果 5例患儿均存在结构畸形合并喂养困难（均排除鼻后孔闭锁），其中2例出现歪嘴哭。3例患儿合并鼻腔狭窄或者上气道塌陷综合征，因治疗效果差，不能撤离呼吸机最终死亡；1例患儿因家属放弃治疗死于家中；1例目前随访中。家系1为CHD7基因c.478del（Y160Tfs*51）移码变异，家系2为CHD7基因c.5428C>T(P.R1810*)无义变异，家系3为CHD7基因c.6292C>T(P.R2098*)无义变异，家系4为CHD7基因c.4317delA（p.Q1440S fs*3）移码变异，家系5为CHD7基因c.469C>T(P.R157*)无义变异。5个家系的父母均未携带相应的变异，均为新发变异。其中家系4的CHD7基因c.4317delA为未报道的新变异。结论 CHD7基因变异可能为5例患儿的致病原因，其中4例患儿死亡的遗传学病因可能为CHD7基因变异导致的系统畸形。对于类似多发畸形患儿临床诊断的同时应积极完善基因检测明确遗传学诊断，以提高对该病的认识。
王颍源 , 方盼盼 , 陈蒙蒙 , 郭静 , 刘大鹏 , 康文清 . 新生儿CHARGE综合征5例临床及基因变异分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2023 , 41(11) : 846 -851 . DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2023.22e0695
Objective To analyze the clinical features and gene variation characteristics of 5 children diagnosed with neonatal CHARGE syndrome, and to identify the genetic etiology of the deaths. Methods The clinical data of 5 children were collected. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to detect 5 children with suspected CHARGE syndrome, and Sanger sequencing technology was used to verify the suspicious loci and core family members. Results Clinical features of 5 cases: structural deformity combined with feeding difficulties (both excluded posterior nasal atresia), 2 children with crooked mouth crying, 3 children with nasal cavity stenosis or upper airway collapse syndrome who, due to poor treatment effect, could not be removed from the ventilator and eventually died, 1 patient's family members gave up treatment and died at home; 1 patient is currently being followed up. Family 1 had a frameshift variant of the CHD7 gene c.478del (Y160Tfs*51), family 2 had a nonsense variant of the CHD7 gene c.5428C>T (P.R1810*), and family 3 had a nonsense variant of the CHD7 gene c.6292C>T (P. R2098*), family 4 had a frameshift variant of the CHD7 gene c.4317delA (p.Q1440S fs*3), family 5 had a nonsense variant of the CHD7 gene c.469C>T (P.R157*). The parents of the 5 families did not carry the corresponding variats, and the varians were all de novo. The c.4317delA in family 4 was previously unreported. Conclusion The CHD7 gene mutation may be the pathogenic cause of 5 cases. The genetic cause of death in 4 cases may be system malformation caused by CHD7 gene mutation; for the clinical diagnosis of children with similar multiple malformations, the genetic testing should be actively improved to make the diagnosis clear, so as to improve the clinician's understanding of the disease.
Key words： CHARGE syndrome; CHD7 gene; newborn
| [1] | Janssen N, Bergman JE, Swertz MA, et al. Mutation update on the CHD7 gene involved in CHARGE syndrome[J]. Hum Mutat, 2012, 33(8): 1149-1160. |
| [2] | Hsu P, Ma A, Wilson M, et al. CHARGE syndrome: a review[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2014, 50(7): 504-511. |
| [3] | Granadillo JL, Wegner DJ, Paul AJ, et al. Discovery of a novel CHD7 CHARGE syndrome variant by integrated omics analyses[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2021, 185(2): 544-548. |
| [4] | Hale CL, Niederriter AN, Green GE, et al. Atypical phenotypes associated with pathogenic CHD7 variants and a proposal for broadening CHARGE syndrome clinical diagnostic criteria[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2016, 170A(2): 344-354. |
| [5] | Wang H, Xiao F, Dong X, et al. Diagnostic and clinical utility of next-generation sequencing in children born with multiple congenital anomalies in the China neonatal genomes project[J]. Hum Mutat, 2021, 42(4): 434-444. |
| [6] | Lalani SR, Safiullah AM, Fernbach SD, et al. Spectrum of CHD7 mutations in 110 individuals with CHARGE syndrome and genotype-phenotype correlation[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2006, 78(2): 303-314. |
| [7] | Gennery AR, Slatter MA, Rice J, et al. Mutations in CHD7 in patients with CHARGE syndrome cause T-B + natural killer cell + severe combined immune deficiency and may cause Omenn-like syndrome[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2008, 153(1): 75-80. |
| [8] | Vissers LE, van Ravenswaaij CM, Admiraal R, et al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome[J]. Nat Genet, 2004, 36(9): 955-957. |
| [9] | Biard JM, Payrat S, Clapuyt P, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome: prenatal ultrasound findings and crucial role of fetal dysmorphic signs. About a series of 10 cases and review of literature[J]. Eur J Med Genet, 2021, 64(4): 104189. |
| [10] | Blake KD, Davenport SL, Hall BD, et al. CHARGE association: an update and review for the primary pediatrician[J]. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 1998, 37(3): 159-173. |
| [11] | Verloes A. Updated diagnostic criteria for CHARGE syndrome: a proposal[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2005, 133A(3): 306-308. |
| [12] | Bedeschi MF, Crippa BL, Colombo L, et al. A case series of CHARGE syndrome: identification of key features for a neonatal diagnosis[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2020, 46(1): 53. |
| [13] | Meisner JK, Martin DM. Congenital heart defects in CHARGE: the molecular role of CHD7 and effects on cardiac phenotype and clinical outcomes[J]. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 2020, 184(1): 81-89. |
| [14] | Pasick C, Mcdonald-Mcginn DM, Simbolon C, et al. Asymmetric crying facies in the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: implications for future screening[J]. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 2013, 52(12): 1144-1148. |
| [15] | Urschel D, Hernandez-Trujillo VP. Spectrum of genetic T-cell disorders from 22q11.2DS to CHARGE[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2022, 63(1): 99-105. |
| [16] | Chen X, Yan K, Gao Y, et al. Feeding difficulty is the dominant feature in 12 Chinese newborns with CHD7 pathogenic variants[J]. BMC Med Genet, 2019, 20(1): 93-102. |
| [17] | Uchiyama T, Kawakami S, Masuda H, et al. A distinct feature of T cell subpopulations in a patient with CHARGE syndrome and Omenn syndrome[J]. J Clin Immunol, 2021, 41(1): 233-237. |
| [18] | Simpson BN, Khattar D, Saal H, et al. CHARGE syndrome in the era of molecular diagnosis: similar outcomes in those without coloboma or choanal atresia[J]. Eur J Med Genet, 2021, 64(1): 104103. |
| [19] | Bergman JE, Blake KD, Bakker MK, et al. Death in CHARGE syndrome after the neonatal period[J]. Clin Genet, 2010, 77(3): 232-240. |
| [20] | 杨莹, 刘毓, 文静, 等. CHARGE综合征2例报告并文献复习[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2019, 37(12): 898-901. |
| [21] | Ufartes R, Grün R, Salinas G, et al. CHARGE syndrome and related disorders: a mechanistic link[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2021, 30(23): 2215-2224. |
| [22] | Qin Z, Su J, Li M, et al. Clinical and genetic analysis of CHD7 expands the genotype and phenotype of CHARGE syndrome[J]. Front Genet, 2020, 11: 592. |
| [23] | Bedeschi MF, Crippa BL, Colombo L, et al. A case series of CHARGE syndrome: identification of key features for a neonatal diagnosis[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2020, 46(1): 53. |
| [24] | Galvez-Ruiz A, Galindo-Ferreiro A, Lehner AJ. CHARGE syndrome: a case report of two new CDH7 gene mutations[J]. Saudi J Ophthalmol, 2021, 34(4): 306-309. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
沪公网安备 31011002000392号
