论著

2012—2022年上海孕期流感疫苗接种的人口学特征及与早产结局关联研究

  • 宁茜囡 ,
  • 马中慧 ,
  • 王春芳 ,
  • 黄卓英 ,
  • 蒋泓 ,
  • 虞慧婷 ,
  • 夏天
展开
  • 1.复旦大学公共卫生学院(上海 200032)
    2.上海市疾病预防控制中心(上海 200336)
虞慧婷 电子信箱:yuhuiting@scdc.sh.cn
夏天 电子信箱:xiatian@scdc.sh.cn

收稿日期: 2025-04-11

  录用日期: 2025-05-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-08-27

基金资助

上海市第六轮公共卫生三年行动计划重点学科项目(2023—2025年)(GWVI-11.1-31);上海市第六轮公共卫生三年行动计划重点学科项目(2023—2025年)(GWVI-11.1-35);比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会创新实验室项目(INV-034554)

The association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy from 2012 to 2022 and demographic characteristics and preterm birth outcomes in Shanghai

  • NING Xinan ,
  • MA Zhonghui ,
  • WANG Chunfang ,
  • HUANG Zhuoying ,
  • JIANG Hong ,
  • YU Huiting ,
  • XIA Tian
Expand
  • 1. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    2. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China

Received date: 2025-04-11

  Accepted date: 2025-05-26

  Online published: 2025-08-27

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨上海市产妇孕期流感疫苗的接种情况,分析影响接种行为的主要人口学特征,评估孕期流感疫苗接种与早产结局之间的潜在关联,为我国流感疫苗接种策略提供实证依据。方法 收集上海市出生医学信息系统中2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日的全部产妇及其新生儿信息,采用多因素logistic回归模型,分析影响孕期女性接种流感疫苗的主要人口学因素,评估孕期接种流感疫苗与早产结局之间的关联性。结果 研究期间共2 209名产妇在孕期接种流感疫苗。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,产妇户籍、年龄、学历,配偶年龄、学历,流产史及子代出生年份均为孕期接种流感疫苗的影响因素(均P<0.001)。与上海市户籍产妇相比,外省市户籍产妇接种的可能性较低(调整后OR=0.83,95%CI:0.76~0.91);与<25岁组相比,25~34岁(调整后OR=2.65,95%CI:1.75~4.00)和≥35岁组(调整后OR=3.35,95%CI:2.19~5.14)产妇的接种可能性更高;与配偶年龄<25岁者相比,配偶年龄≥35岁者的产妇更可能接种(调整后OR=2.74,95%CI:1.57~4.78);与产妇学历为大学以下者相比,大学及以上学历者接种可能性更高(调整后OR=5.63,95%CI:95%CI:4.30~7.38);配偶学历为大学及以上者相比于大学以下者也更倾向于接种(调整后OR=2.19,95%CI:1.78~2.69);与无流产史者相比,有流产史者的接种可能性较低(调整后OR=0.76,95%CI:0.70~0.84);与子代出生于2012—2015年者相比,子代出生于2016—2019年(调整后OR=8.70,95%CI:6.45~11.75)和2020—2022年(调整后OR=54.56,95%CI:40.79~72.97)的产妇孕期接种可能性显著增加。在调整产妇户籍、年龄、学历,配偶年龄、学历、单/多胎妊娠、流产史、妊娠期高血压、妊娠期高血糖、子代出生年份后,与孕期未接种任何疫苗的产妇相比,孕期接种流感疫苗的产妇早产风险显著降低35%(调整后OR=0.65,95%CI:0.53~0.81)。结论 多个社会人口学特征与2012—2022年上海市产妇孕期疫苗接种行为存在显著关联,且孕期接种流感疫苗可能与早产风险降低有关。建议进一步加强科普宣传与服务保障,持续推进疫苗接种工作,切实保障母婴健康。

本文引用格式

宁茜囡 , 马中慧 , 王春芳 , 黄卓英 , 蒋泓 , 虞慧婷 , 夏天 . 2012—2022年上海孕期流感疫苗接种的人口学特征及与早产结局关联研究[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2025 , 43(9) : 661 -669 . DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2025.25e0371

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in Shanghai, analyze the main demographic factors influencing vaccination behavior, and further assess the potential association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and the occurrence of preterm birth, providing empirical evidence for influenza vaccination strategies in China. Methods All the information of the mothers and their newborns from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022 in the Shanghai Birth Medical Information System was collected. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the main demographic factors influencing influenza vaccination among pregnant women and to evaluate the association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and preterm birth outcomes. Results During the study period, 2209 pregnant women received influenza vaccination. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that maternal residency, age, education, spouse’s age and education, history of miscarriage, and offspring birth year were significant factors influencing influenza vaccination during pregnancy (all P<0.001). Compared with pregnant women registered in Shanghai, those with residency outside Shanghai had a lower likelihood of vaccination (adjusted OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.91). Compared to women aged < 25 years, those aged 25-34 years (adjusted OR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.75-4.00) and ≥ 35 years (adjusted OR=3.35, 95% CI: 2.19-5.14) had higher likelihoods of vaccination. Women whose spouses were ≥ 35 years old were more likely to be vaccinated compared with those whose spouses were < 25 years old (adjusted OR=2.74, 95% CI: 1.57-4.78). Women with a college degree or above had a higher likelihood of vaccination than those with less than college education (adjusted OR=5.63, 95% CI: 4.30-7.38), and similarly, women whose spouses had a college degree or above were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those whose spouses had lower education (adjusted OR=2.19, 95% CI: 1.78-2.69). Women with a history of miscarriage were less likely to be vaccinated compared with those without (adjusted OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.84). Compared to offspring born between 2012 and 2015, women with offspring born between 2016 and 2019 (adjusted OR=8.70, 95% CI: 6.45-11.75) and between 2020 and 2022 (adjusted OR=54.56, 95% CI: 40.79-72.97) were significantly more likely to receive influenza vaccination during pregnancy. After adjusting for maternal residency, age, education, spouse’s age and education, single/multiple pregnancies, history of miscarriage, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and offspring birth year, influenza vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a 35% reduction in the risk of preterm birth compared to that of no vaccination during pregnancy (adjusted OR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.81). Conclusions Multiple sociodemographic factors are significantly associated with influenza vaccination behavior among pregnant women in Shanghai between 2012 and 2022, and influenza vaccination during pregnancy may be related to a reduced risk of preterm birth. It is recommended to further strengthen public education and service support, continuously promote vaccination efforts, and effectively safeguard maternal and infant health.

参考文献

[1] 李珊珊, 胡丹丹. 儿童甲型H1N1流行性感冒相关性脑病死亡危险因素分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2025, 43(3): 177-183.
  Li SS, Hu DD. Analysis of risk factors for death from influenza A (H1N1)-associated encephalopathy in children[J]. Linchuang Erke Zazhi, 2025, 43(3): 177-183.
[2] Holstein R, Dawood FS, O'Halloran A, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized pregnant women with influenza, 2010 to 2019 : a repeated cross-sectional study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2022, 175(2): 149-158.
[3] Wen T, Arditi B, Riley LE, et al. Influenza complicating delivery hospitalization and its association with severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2000-2018[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 138(2): 218-227.
[4] Wang R, Yan W, Du M, et al. The effect of influenza virus infection on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2021, 105: 567-578.
[5] Wolfe DM, Fell D, Garritty C, et al. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(9): e066182.
[6] Quach THT, Mallis NA, Cordero JF. Influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Matern Child Health J, 2020, 24(2): 229-240.
[7] de Bruin O, Phijffer E, Ahmadizar F, et al. Are maternal vaccines effective and safe for mothers and infants? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2023, 8(10): e012376.
[8] World Health O. Vaccines against influenza WHO position paper - November 2012[J]. Wkly Epidemiol Rec, 2012, 87(47): 461-476.
[9] 冯录召, 杨鹏, 张涛, 等. 中国季节性流感疫苗应用技术指南(2014-2015)[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2014, 35(12): 1295-1319.
  Feng LZ, Yang P, Zhang T, et al. Technical guidelines for the application of seasonal influenza vaccine in China (2014-2015)[J]. Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2014, 35(12): 1295-1319.
[10] 国家免疫规划技术工作组流感疫苗工作组. 中国流感疫苗预防接种技术指南(2023-2024)[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2023, 44(10): 1507-1530.
  Influenza Vaccine Working Group, National Immunization Program Technical Working Group. Technical guidelines for influenza vaccination in China (2023-2024)[J]. Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2023, 44(10): 1507-1530.
[11] 姜玢杉, 曹琰琳, 冯录召. 多维度推动接种政策,促进中国流感疫苗应用[R]. 中国: 昆山杜克大学全球健康研究中心疫苗交付研究创新实验室, 2023.
  Jiang BS, Cao YL, Feng LZ. Promoting influenza vaccine uptake in China through multi-dimensional vaccination policy strategies[R]. China: Vaccine Delivery Research and Innovation Lab, Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, 2023.
[12] 国家卫生健康委员会. 关于进一步加强流行性感冒防控工作的通知[EB/OL]. 北京: 国家卫生健康委员会. 2018 [2025-04-11]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5435469.htm.
  National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on further strengthening the prevention and control of influenza[EB/OL]. Beijing: National Health Commission, 2018 [2025-04-11]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5435469.htm.
[13] 健康中国行动推进委员会. 健康中国行动(2019-2030年) [EB/OL]. 北京: 健康中国行动推进委员会. 2019 [2025-04-11]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
  Healthy China Initiative Promotion Committee. Healthy China Initiative (2019-2030)[EB/OL]. Beijing: Healthy China Initiative Promotion Committee, 2019 [2025-04-11]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
[14] 彭质斌, 王大燕, 杨娟, 等. 中国流感疫苗应用现状及促进预防接种的政策探讨[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2018, 39(8): 1045-1050.
  Peng ZB, Wang DY, Yang J, et al. Current status of influenza vaccine use and policy discussions to promote vaccination in China[J]. Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2018, 39(8): 1045-1050.
[15] 胡家瑜, 孙晓冬. 上海市预防接种工作发展历程与展望[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2019, 22(4): 262-265.
  Hu JY, Sun XD. Development and prospects of immunization work in Shanghai[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Ziyuan, 2019, 22(4): 262-265.
[16] 和雯婷, 吕军, 甘晓卫, 等. 上海市孕妇对孕产期保健的认知行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2012, 29(8): 626-629.
  He WT, Lyu J, Gan XW, et al. Analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding maternal healthcare among pregnant women in Shanghai and influencing factors[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Shiye Guanli, 2012, 29(8): 626-629.
[17] 陶印华, 申悦. 医疗设施可达性空间差异及其影响因素——基于上海市户籍与流动人口的对比[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1075-1085.
  Tao YH, Shen Y. Spatial disparities in healthcare facility accessibility and influencing factors: a comparative study of registered and migrant populations in Shanghai[J]. Dili Kexue Jinzhan, 2018, 37(8): 1075-1085.
[18] Marin ES, McCall-Hosenfeld J, Weng X, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women: demographics and medical care access[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023, 162(1): 125-132.
[19] 王睿, 张媛媛, 刘成, 等. 苏州市孕妇人群流感及流感疫苗相关知识、态度和行为的现况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2024, 45(12): 1672-1678.
  Wang R, Zhang YY, Liu C, et al. Survey and analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding influenza and influenza vaccination among pregnant women in Suzhou[J]. Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2024, 45(12): 1672-1678.
[20] B?deker B, Betsch C, Wichmann O. Skewed risk perceptions in pregnant women: the case of influenza vaccination[J]. BMC Public Health, 2015, 16: 1308.
[21] 朱丹旎, 王耀刚, 张馨予. 流感疫苗接种成效的卫生经济学评价现状[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2024, 23(10): 1319-1325.
  Zhu DN, Wang YG, Zhang XY. Current status of health economic evaluations on influenza vaccination effectiveness[J]. Zhongguo Ganran Kongzhi Zazhi, 2024, 23(10): 1319-1325.
[22] 丁岚, 祁杨杨. 高学历人群代际流动性的阶段解析——基于CGSS及CLDS数据[J]. 大学教育科学, 2018, 6: 39-46.
  Ding L, Qi YY. Stage analysis of intergenerational mobility among highly educated populations: based on CGSS and CLDS data[J]. Daxue Jiaoyu Kexue, 2018, 6: 39-46.
[23] 侯启春, 周倩龄, 宋波, 等. 孕期保健知识获取途径及其影响因素[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2022, 13(3): 38-44.
  Hou QC, Zhou QL, Song B, et al. Sources of maternal health knowledge during pregnancy and influencing factors[J]. Zhongguo Fuyou Weisheng Zazhi, 2022, 13(3): 38-44.
[24] Kyn?l J, Liptáková M, Ko??álová J, et al. Vaccination against influenza in pregnant women in a maternity hospital in the Czech Republic in the season 2020-2021[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1): 1029.
[25] Undela K, Joy N, Gurumurthy P, et al. Knowledge, beliefs, and practice of pregnant women regarding medication use during pregnancy: a hospital-based cross-sectional study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 41(4): 522-526.
[26] Studnicki J, Cox TL, Fisher JW, et al. First pregnancy abortion or natural pregnancy loss: a cohort study of mental health services utilization[J]. Issues Law Med, 2024, 39(2): 100-116.
[27] Wang J, Liu W, Zhuang Y, et al. Influenza A virus infection disrupts the function of syncytiotrophoblast cells and contributes to adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. J Med Virol, 2024, 96(6): e29687.
[28] Giles ML, Gunatilaka A, Cole S, et al. The non-specific effects of maternal immunization on birth outcomes: the evidence, mechanisms, and the implications[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023, 162(1): 13-17.
[29] Giles ML, Krishnaswamy S, Macartney K, et al. The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review[J]. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2019, 15(3): 687-699.
[30] Getahun D, Liu IA, Sy LS, et al. Safety of the seasonal influenza vaccine in 2 successive pregnancies[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(9): e2434857.
[31] Deng K, Liang J, Mu Y, et al. Preterm births in China between 2012 and 2018: an observational study of more than 9 million women[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2021, 9(9): e1226-e1241.
[32] Wu CQ, Nichols K, Carwana M, et al. Preterm birth after recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2022, 117(4): 811-819.
[33] Jin M, Liu X, Liu X, et al. Association of pre-/early pregnancy high blood pressure and pregnancy outcomes: a systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2024, 37(1): 2296366.
[34] Ha AS, Scott M, Zhang CA, et al. Sociodemographic trends and perinatal outcomes in fathers 50 years and older[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(8): e2425269.
文章导航

/