述评

我国新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的诊治挑战与研究展望

  • 贺雨 ,
  • 朱兴旺 ,
  • 范颖 ,
  • 史源
展开
  • 1.重庆医科大学附属儿童医院新生儿科 儿童少年健康与疾病国家临床医学研究中心 儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室 儿童感染与免疫罕见病重庆市重点实验室(重庆 400070)
    2.重庆市璧山区妇幼保健院(重庆 402760)
第一联系人:

具有同等贡献

史源 电子信箱:shiyuan@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-12-11

  录用日期: 2026-01-13

  网络出版日期: 2026-02-02

Challenges and research progress in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in China

  • HE Yu ,
  • ZHU Xingwang ,
  • FAN Ying ,
  • SHI Yuan
Expand
  • 1. Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents Health and Diseases, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Rare Diseases in Infection and Immunity, Chongqing 400070, China
    2. Women and Children’s Hospital of Bishan, Chongqing 402760, China

Received date: 2025-12-11

  Accepted date: 2026-01-13

  Online published: 2026-02-02

摘要

随着围产医学和极早产儿救治水平的提高,近年来新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)等早产儿严重呼吸系统并发症的发病率不断升高。尽管我国NRDS的诊治水平已经取得了长足的进步,但是重度颅内出血、支气管肺发育不良等并发症的发生率仍显著高于欧美发达国家。当前,NRDS的诊治仍面临一些挑战,如NRDS与新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(NARDS)早期鉴别诊断困难,可能导致部分患儿未能获得有效治疗。同时,NRDS治疗中的部分科学问题存在争议,如肺表面活性物质的使用时机、有创通气模式的选择、撤机后过渡通气策略选择等,临床均未达成共识,或者虽有共识却基于并不完备的临床证据。依托国家战略支持和中国新生儿协作网等多中心协作平台,我国学者近期在BMJ等权威期刊接连发表一系列关于NRDS的高质量临床研究成果,直面当前诊疗中的争议与挑战,为用中国数据改善患儿预后提供了坚实证据。本文将梳理NRDS的诊疗现状、最新关键发现及未来研究方向,以提升临床医师的认知水平。

本文引用格式

贺雨 , 朱兴旺 , 范颖 , 史源 . 我国新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的诊治挑战与研究展望[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2026 , 44(2) : 95 -100 . DOI: 10.12372/jcp.2026.25e1570

Abstract

With advances in perinatal medicine and improved care for extremely preterm infants, the incidence of severe respiratory complications—such as neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS)—has risen in recent years. Although the diagnosis and management of NRDS in China have made substantial progress, rates of severe complications, including severe intracranial hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), remain markedly higher than those observed in high-income countries in Europe and North America. Current clinical practice faces several critical challenges, including difficulties in the early differentiation of NRDS from neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS), which may delay timely and appropriate interventions. Furthermore, key therapeutic decisions lack robust evidence or consensus, such as the optimal timing of pulmonary surfactant administration, selection of invasive ventilation strategies, and post-extubation respiratory support approaches—some guidelines exist but are often based on limited or low-quality data. Leveraging national strategic initiatives and multicenter collaborative platforms like the China Neonatal Network (CHNN), Chinese researchers have recently published a series of high-impact studies on NRDS in leading journals including The BMJ, directly addressing these unresolved clinical questions and generating high-quality, context-specific evidence to improve outcomes. This article reviews the current landscape of NRDS management, highlights pivotal recent findings, and outlines future research priorities, in order to enhance the cognitive level of chinical physicians.

参考文献

[1] Ancel PY, Goffinet F, Kuhn P, et al. Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2015, 169(3): 230-238.
[2] 何玥, 陈晓, 俎丽娇, 等. 2019—2023年CHNN出生胎龄<32周早产儿RDS临床救治及结局分析[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2025, 63(8): 870-878.
  He Y, Chen X, Zu LJ, et al. Clinical management and outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <32 weeks’gestation from the Chinese Neonatal Network from 2019 to 2023[J]. Zhonghua Erke Zazhi, 2025, 63(8): 870-878.
[3] De Luca D. Respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates in the era of precision medicine: a modern critical care-based approach[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2021, 62 Suppl 1: S3-S9.
[4] Zeitlin J, Bonamy AE, Bonet M, et al. PS-047 tradeoffs between mortality and morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the Epice Cohort[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2014, 99(Suppl 2): A129.
[5] De Luca D, Van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, et al. The Montreux definition of neonatal ARDS: biological and clinical background behind the description of a new entity[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2017, 5(8): 657-666.
[6] De Luca D, Tingay DG, Van Kaam AH, et al. Epidemiology of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome: Prospective, Multicenter, International Cohort study[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2022, 23(7): 524-534.
[7] Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update[J]. Neonatology, 2023, 120(1): 3-23.
[8] De Jaegere AP, Van Der Lee JH, Canté C, et al. Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2012, 101(4): 374-379.
[9] Raimondi F, Dolce P, Veropalumbo C, et al. Inspired oxygen fraction thresholds to accurately predict surfactant administration in neonatal RDS is gestational age strata: a pragmatic,multi‐center study[J]. Pediatr Res, 2024, 59(6): 1638-1644.
[10] 中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会循证专业委员会. 容量目标通气模式在新生儿呼吸支持中的应用指南[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(2): 125-133.
[11] Fang SJ, Su CH, Liao DL, et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist for rapid weaning in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Int, 2023, 65(1): e15360.
[12] 张艳, 李书芳, 蒋秀芳, 等. NAVA联合PS治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效及对预后的影响分析[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2018, 38(6): 441-445.
  Zhang Y, Li SF, Jiang XF, et al. Clinical effect of neurally adjusted ventilatory asist combined with pulmonary surfactant in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress and its effect on prognosis[J]. Guoji Huxi Zazhi, 2018, 38(6): 441-445.
[13] Henderson-Smart DJ, Bhuta T, Cools F, et al. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000(2): Cd000104.
[14] Yu X, Tan Q, Li J, et al. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation on the chronic lung disease or death in preterm infants administered surfactant:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Perinatol, 2025, 45(1): 77-84.
[15] Liu K, Chen L, Xiong J, et al. HFOV vs CMV for neonates with moderate-to-severe perinatal onset acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS): a propensity score analysis[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2021, 180(7): 2155-2164.
[16] Yang MC, Hsu JF, Hsiao HF, et al. Use of high frequency oscillatory ventilator in neonates with respiratory failure:the clinical practice in Taiwan and early multimodal outcome prediction[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 6603.
[17] Tao M, Yan L, Hu Y, et al. The effects of HFOV-VG vs HFOV on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurobehavioral development in preterm infants with perinatal acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2025, 18: 4695-4708.
[18] Zheng YR, Xie WP, Liu JF, et al. Impact of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with volume guarantee on lung inflammatory response in infants with acute respiratory distress syndrome after congenital heart surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 36(8 Pt A): 2368-2375.
[19] Liu W, Zong H, Jiang J, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation with volume guarantee in infants: a systematic review[J]. Pediatr Res, 2025, 98(2): 470-478.
[20] Tingay DG, Dahm SI, Sett A. Are we ready for volume targeting during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates?[J]. Pediatr Res, 2025, 98(2): 354-356.
[21] 张志刚, 张家杰, 夏晓芹, 等. nIPPV序贯通气在新生儿肺炎早期撤机方案中的应用研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2020, 26(23): 3564-3566.
  Zhang ZG, Zhang JJ, Xia XQ, et al. Clinical study on the optimal weaning time in NIPPV sequential mechanical ventilation treatment for neonatal pneumonia[J]. Guoji Yiyao Weisheng Daobao, 2020, 26(23): 3564-3566.
[22] Chen L, Wang L, Ma J, et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and ARDS after extubation: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(4): 740-748.
[23] Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, et al. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2022, 176(6): 551-559.
[24] 师红可, 梁克令, 安丽花, 等. 无创高频振荡通气与经鼻间歇正压通气作为早产儿拔管后呼吸支持疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2023, 25(3): 295-301.
  Shi HK, Liang KL, An LH, et al. Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a Meta analysis[J]. Zhongguo Dangdai Erke Zazhi, 2023, 25(3): 295-301.
[25] Chen J, Lin Y, Du L, et al. The comparison of HHHFNC and NCPAP in extremely low-birth-weight preterm infants after extubation: a single-center pandomized controlled trial[J]. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 250.
[26] 张国英, 郑静, 王晓蕾, 等. 有创-无创序贯性通气治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的临床研究[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2007, 14(5): 400-403.
  Zhang GY, Zheng J, Wang XL, et al. Sequential invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation in neonatal respiratory failure[J]. Zhongguo Xiaoer Jijiu Yixue, 2007, 14(5): 400-403.
[27] Shi Y, Muniraman H, Biniwale M, et al. A review on non-invasive respiratory support for management of respiratory distress in extremely preterm infants[J]. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 270.
[28] Yuan Y, He F, Wu D, et al. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2025, 30(1): 577.
[29] Matlock DN, Ratcliffe SJ, Courtney SE, et al. The Diaphragmatic Initiated Ventilatory Assist (DIVA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing rates of extubation failure in extremely premature infants undergoing extubation to non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation[J]. Trials, 2024, 25(1): 201.
[30] Li Y, Zhu X, Li LJ, et al. Non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation for primary respiratory support in extremely preterm infants:multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ, 2025, 391(6): e085569.
文章导航

/