›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 747-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2017.10.008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of noninvasive cardiac index test in the evaluation of neonatal congenital heart disease complicated with heart failure

YUAN Yonghua1, ZHANG Aimin2, HE Xuehua1, XU Jun2, HUANG Furong2, LIU Liping1, Liu Zhenyu1, XIA Xiaohui3, Lv Mei1, ZHU Qianli1, LI Aitong4   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hunan People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China; 2. Department of Neonatal, Hunan People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China; 3. Department of Ultrasound, Hunan People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China; 4. Hunan Normal University Medical School 2013 Excellent Doctor Class, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China
  • Received:2017-10-15 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2017-10-15

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of the monitoring of electronic cardiac index (CI) in the evaluation of neonatal congenital heart disease complicated with heart failure. Methods Sixty neonates with congenital heart disease treated in neonatal department from March 1, 2016 to December 30, 2016 were selected, and divided into severe group (n=11), moderate group (n=15), mild group (n=34), and no heart failure group (n=10) according to the modified Ross heart failure score. CI was measured by electronic force measurement. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) were measured by echocardiography. Venous blood sampling was collected to detect the N-terminal type B brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Results The neonates in the severe group were mainly under 2-week-old, while those in the mild group and the moderate group were more than 2-week-old. The differences of CI, LVEF, NT-proBNP, and PAP among the groups were statistically different. The CI and LVEF values were lowest in the severe group, followed by moderate group and mild group, and the highest in no heart failure group. The NT-proBNP and PAP values were the highest in the severe group, followed by moderate group and mild group, and the lowest in no heart failure group. Correlation analysis showed that CI was positively correlated with LVEF (r=0.845, P<0.001), and negatively correlated with NT-proBNP (r=-0.886, P<0.001); CI and PAP were weakly negatively correlated (r=-0.595, P<0.001). Conclusions CI reflects the degree of heart failure to some extent and has some clinical value.