临床儿科杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 751-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2017.10.009

• 综合报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童不同程度心肌致密化不全临床特点分析#br#

周挥茗, 刘玲娟, 吴瑶, 吕铁伟, 田杰   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院心内科 儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室 儿童发育重大疾病    国家国际科技合作基地 儿科学重庆市重点实验室(重庆 400014)
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-15 出版日期:2017-10-15 发布日期:2017-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 田杰 E-mail:jietian@cqmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.81270234、81570218);重庆市科委民生项目(No.cstc2016shmszx130003)

Analysis of clinical characteristics of different degrees of myocardial noncompaction in children

 ZHOU Huiming, LIU Lingjuan, WU Yao, LYU Tiewei, TIAN Jie   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing 400014, China
  • Received:2017-10-15 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2017-10-15

摘要: 目的 探讨不同程度心肌致密化不全患儿的临床特征及预后,探讨非致密化心肌层与致密心肌层厚度之比 (N/C)的临床指导意义。方法 回顾分析心肌致密化不全患儿的临床资料,比较N/C>2.0和N/C 1.4~2.0两组患儿的情况。 结果 两组患儿各26例,年龄、性别、低出生体质量和营养不良比例,心脏病变及合并症的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 出院时N/C>2.0组病情好转8例,无明显好转15例,死亡3例;N/C 1.4~2.0组病情好转18例,无明显好转8例,无死亡病 例。两组治疗有效率差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.69, P=0.006)。 随访出院后8年内N/C>2.0组病死率高于N/C 1.4~2.0组, 差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.993, P=0.008)。 结论 心肌致密化不全患儿的N/C值越大,治疗有效率越低,预后越差。

Abstract:  Objectives To explore the clinical characteristics and prognosis of different degrees of noncompaction of ventricular myocardium (NVM) in children and to investigate the clinical significance of the ratio of the thickness of the noncompact myocardium to the dense myocardium (N/C). Methods The clinical data of the children with NVM were analyzed retrospectively. The differences between children with N/C > 2.0 and children with N/C 1.4~2.0 were compared. Results There were 26 children in each of the two groups. There was no significant difference in age, sex, the ratios of low birth weight and malnutrition, heart disease, and complication (P all > 0.05). When discharged, 8 cases were improved, 15 cases has no obvious improvement, and 3 cases died in N/C>2.0 group; while 18 cases were improved, 8 cases has no obvious improvement, and none died in N/C 1.4~2.0 group, and the effective rate of treatment between two groups was statistically difference (χ2=7.69, P=0.006). In 8 years of follow-up, the mortality rate in N/C > 2.0 group was higher than that in N/C 1.4~2.0 group, and the difference was statistically different (χ2=6.993, P=0.008). Conclusions The treatment efficiency was lower and the prognosis was worse when the N/C value was higher in children with NVM.