临床儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 641-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2019.09.001

• 新生儿疾病专栏 •    下一篇

改良序贯法在发热新生儿中的应用

李萍萍,黄雪霏,黄栩栩,等   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院新生儿诊治中心 儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室 儿童发育重大 疾病国家国际科技合作基地 儿科学重庆市重点实验室(重庆 400014)
  • 发布日期:2020-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 韦红 电子信箱: 1056670630@qq.com

Application of modified sequential method in febrile neonates

LI Pingping, HUANG Xuefei, HUANG Xuxu, WEI Hong   

  1. Department of Neonatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing 400014, China
  • Published:2020-01-16

摘要:  目的 建立基于临床和实验室指标的改良序贯法以评估发热新生儿是否合并感染,并评估其应用价值。方 法 回顾分析2015年10月—2017年10月入住新生儿病房的230例发热新生儿的临床资料,建立基于临床和实验室指标 的改良序贯法,对发热新生儿是否感染进行评估,并与实验室评分方法相比较。结果 230例足月发热新生儿中诊断为败 血症112例(48.7%)。 按改良序贯法依次对患儿的一般情况、年龄、尿常规、降钙素原、 C反应蛋白和中性粒细胞绝对计数 进行评估分类,分类为败血症新生儿的患病率明显高于非败血症者,其识别败血症发热新生儿的灵敏度、阴性预测值、阴 性似然比分别为98.2%、94.8%、0.02,实验室评分为66.1%、72.9%、0.40。采用改良序贯法进行评估, 2例败血症患儿 被错判为非败血症患儿。运用实验室评分法,38例败血症患儿被错判为非败血症患儿。结论 改良序贯法可以识别出感 染与非感染患儿,对于感染新生儿改良序贯法灵敏度高,相比实验室评分有更高的应用价值。

关键词: 发热新生儿; 新生儿败血症; 低风险标准; 实验室评分

Abstract: Objective To establish a modified sequential method based on clinical and laboratory indicators for assessment of whether febrile neonates were complicated with infection and evaluate its application value. Methods The clinical data of 230 febrile neonates admitted to the NICU from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A modified sequential method based on clinical and laboratory indicators was established to evaluate whether febrile neonates were infected or not, and to compare it with the laboratory scoring method. Results In the 230 full-term febrile neonates, 112 (48.7%) were diagnosed with sepsis. The general condition, age, urinary routine, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and neutrophil absolute count of children with sepsis were evaluated and classified according to the modified sequential method. The incidence of sepsis neonates was significantly higher than that of non-sepsis neonates. The sensitivity, negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio of modified sequential method in the diagnosis of sepsis were 98.2%, 94.8% and 0.02, and the laboratory score was 66.1%, 72.9% and 0.40, respectively. Two children with sepsis were misjudged as non-sepsis by modified sequential method, and 38 children with sepsis were misjudged as non-sepsis by laboratory scoring method. Conclusions Modified sequential method can identify infected and non-infected children. It has high sensitivity for infected newborns and higher application value than laboratory score.

Key words: febrile neonate; neonatal sepsis; low risk criteria; laboratory score