临床儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 665-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2019.09.007

• 综合报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

Dravet 综合征患儿致病基因定位及GEFS+ 基因突变检测

张华,陈海丹,陈泽燕,唐江利   

  1. 海南省第三人民医院儿科(海南三亚 572000)
  • 发布日期:2020-01-16

Localization of pathogenic gene and mutation detection of GEFS+ gene in children with Dravet syndrome

ZHANG Hua, CHEN Haidan, CHEN Zeyan, TANG Jiangli   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, The Third People's Hospital of Hainan, Sanya 572000, Hainan, China
  • Published:2020-01-16

摘要: 目的 分析海南地区Dravet综合征患儿的遗传特征。方法 收集2015—2017年期间海南省18例Dravet综合 征患儿及家系成员的外周血,采用PCR扩增及Sanger测序法进行SCN1A基因检测,运用连锁分析应用软件GenomeStudio 进行致病基因定位分型与连锁分析;对Sanger测序法未发现SCN1A基因突变的患儿,采用多重连接依赖的探针扩增 (MLPA)方法分析SCN1A基因片段缺失或重复,并筛查父母SCN1A基因,分析其突变来源。结果 18例Dravet综合征患 儿及父母基因定位扫描结果完全符合亲子间的孟德尔遗传关系。SCN1A基因突变患儿可定位到5号、 9号、22号染色体 3个候选突变区域。其中5号染色体区域位于SNP Rs4957954至Rs728937,在Rs1459085处可获取到最大LOD值2.13; 9号染色体区域位于SNP Rs720974至Rs1220087,在Rs71332677处可获取到最大LOD值1.92;22号染色体区域位于 SNP Rs756658至Rs713751,在Rs374225处可获取到最大LOD值1.91。18例患儿中,12例SCN1A基因突变,其中6例 CDS区域的第5383位碱基呈现杂合变异(G→A),4例13号外显子和CDS区域的第2292位碱基纯合变异(T→C),2例 SCN1A基因非编码区域碱基纯合变异(A→T)。 结论 海南Dravet综合征患儿的基因定位完全符合孟德尔遗传关系,推 测Rs4957954至Rs728937、Rs720974至Rs1220087、及Rs756658至Rs713751区域是Dravet综合征的可能致病性区域。

关键词:  Dravet综合征; 致病基因; 定位检测; 基因突变

Abstract: Objective To analyze the genetic characteristics of Dravet syndrome in children in Hainan Province. Methods The peripheral blood of 18 children with Dravet syndrome and their family members in Hainan Province from 2015 to 2017 were collected. The PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing were performed for SCN1A gene detection. The GenomeStudio software was used for the localization and linkage analysis of pathogenic genes. For children who were not found SCN1A gene mutation by Sanger sequencing, the multiple connection dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method was used to analyze the deletion or repetition of the SCN1A gene fragment and to further screen the mutation of the parents' SCN1A gene and analyze the source of the mutation. Results The results of gene location scan in 18 cases of Dravet syndrome and their parents fully conformed to the Mendel genetic relationship between the parents and children. The children with SCN1A gene mutation could be located in three candidate mutation regions of chromosome 5, 9 and 22. The region of chromosome 5 was located between SNP Rs4957954 and Rs728937; the maximum positive LOD value (2.13) was obtained at Rs1459085. The region of chromosome 9 is located between SNP Rs720974 and Rs1220087, and the maximum positive LOD value (1.92) was obtained at is 1.92 at Rs71332677. The region of chromosome 22 was located between SNP Rs756658 and Rs713751, and the maximum positive LOD value (1.91) was obtained at Rs374225. In the 18 children, SCN1A gene mutation was found in 12 children, among whom 6 children had heterozygous variation (G→A) at the 5383rd base in the CDS region, 4 children had homozygous variation (T→C) at exon 13 and 2292nd base in CDS region, and 2 children had homozygous variation (A→T) in non-coding region of SCN1A gene. Conclusions The gene localization of the children with Dravet syndrome in Hainan fully conforms to the Mendelian genetic relationship, and it is speculated that Rs4957954 to Rs728937, Rs720974 to Rs1220087, and Rs756658 to Rs713751 are the possible pathogenic regions of Dravet syndrome.

Key words: Dravet syndrome; pathogenic gene; location detection; gene mutation