临床儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 761-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2019.10.010

• 综合报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

创伤快速超声检查联合肝转氨酶对儿童腹部钝性创伤的诊断价值

童海艇 1, 潘曙明 2, 杜奇容 2, 祝青藤 2, 黄四平 2, 李明 2   

  1. 1.余姚市第二人民医院急诊科(浙江余姚 315400);2. 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院急诊科 (上海 200092)
  • 发布日期:2020-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 杜奇容 电子信箱:dongqirong@xinhuamed.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    儿童国际创伤生命支持急救技术规范(No.2013SY038) ; 上海市卫生计生系统重要薄弱学科建设计划 (No. 2016ZB0203 )

Value of focused assessment with sonography for trauma combined with hepatic transaminase in diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma in children

 TONG Haiting1, PAN Shuming2, DU Qirong2, ZHU Qingteng2, HUANG Siping2, LI Ming2   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency, Yuyao Second People’s Hospital, Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China; 2. Department of Emergency, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Published:2020-01-22

摘要: 目的 探讨创伤快速超声检查(FAST)联合天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST) /丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)对儿童腹 部钝性创伤(BAT)的诊断价值。方法 回顾分析2015年1月至2018年1月急诊BAT患儿的临床资料,以同时检查FAST、 腹部CT与血清AST/ALT的患儿为研究对象,将FAST联合AST>200 IU/L和/或ALT>125 IU/L作为A组,FAST联合 AST>400 IU/L和/或ALT>200 IU/L作为B组,以CT检查结果为金标准,比较FAST组、 A组、 B组对BAT患儿诊断的灵敏度、 特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确率。结果 共纳入1 588例BAT患儿,均完成FAST、CT和血清AST/ALT检查209 例。209例患儿中,CT检查阳性51例(24.4%)。 以CT检查结果为金标准,FAST对于BAT诊断的灵敏度为51.0%,特异度 94.9%,阳性预测值76.5%,阴性预测值85.7%,准确率84.2%。A组对于BAT诊断的灵敏度为88.2%,特异度93.7%, 阳性预测值81.8%,阴性预测值96.1%,准确率92.3%。 A组灵敏度、阴性预测值、准确率均高于FAST检查,差异有统计 学意义(P<0.05)。B组对于BAT诊断的灵敏度为58.8%,特异度为93.7%,阳性预测值为75.0%,阴性预测值为87.6%, 准确率为85.2%。 B组各项指标与FAST检查相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。10例手术患儿中9例为FAST阳性或血 清AST>400 IU/L或ALT>200 IU/L的患儿。结论 FAST联合血清AST>200 IU/L和/或ALT>125 IU/L可作为诊断儿童 BAT的有效筛选工具。对FAST阳性或血清AST>400 IU/L或ALT>200 IU/L患儿,如血流动力学稳定者建议CT检查,既 可保证患儿安全,又可减少不必要的CT辐射损害。

关键词: 创伤快速超声检查; 腹部钝性创伤; 肝转氨酶; 儿童

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) combined with aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in diagnostic of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in children. Method The clinical data of emergency BAT in children from January 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The children who performed the examinations of FAST, abdominal CT and serum AST/ALT simultaneously were selected as study subjects. Children with FAST positive and AST>200 IU/L and/or ALT>125 IU/L were selected as group A, while children with FAST positive and AST>400 IU/L and/or ALT>200 IU/L were selected as group B. Taking CT examination results as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the diagnosis of BAT in FAST group (group A and group B) were compared. Results A total of 1588 BAT children were included, and 209 of them completed FAST, CT and serum AST/ALT examinations. Among the 209 children, 51 (24.4%) were positive in CT examination. Taking CT examination results as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of BAT diagnosis were 51.0%, 94.9%, 76.5%, 85.7% and 84.2% respectively when using FAST. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of BAT diagnosis were 88.2%, 93.7%, 81.8%, 96.1% and 92.3% respectively in group A. The sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of group A were higher than those of FAST, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of BAT diagnosis were 58.8%, 93.7%, 75.0%, 87.6% and 85.2%, respectively in group B and there was no difference between group B and FAST (P > 0.05). Nine of the 10 children with surgery were FAST positive or serum AST > 400 IU/L or ALT > 200 IU/L. Conclusion FAST combined with serum AST>200 IU/L and/or ALT>125 IU/L can be used as an effective screening tool for diagnosis of BAT in children. For children with FAST positive but serum AST>400 IU/L or ALT>200 IU/L, CT examination is recommended for those with hemodynamic stability, which can not only ensure the safety of children, but also reduce unnecessary CT radiation damage.

Key words:  focused assessment with sonography for trauma; blunt abdominal trauma; liver transaminases; chlid